Open your letter with a strong statement that comments on an article, editorial, or other letter that appeared in the newspaper. Your opening statement can take issue with a comment from someone interviewed for the story, add to the discussion by pointing out something readers would need to know, disagree with an editorial position, or point out an error or misrepresentation in an article. Be careful about accuracy and avoid personal attacks. Keep your letter as short as possible by focusing on one, or at most two, major points. Support your position with facts, statistics, citations or other evidence. Aim for no more than 250 words, and be sure to stay under the paper's word limit. Close with the thought you'd like readers to remember.
Writing an Effective, letter to the Editor
November 3, 2004, help animals by putting your opinion in print. Writing a letter to the editor is a great opportunity to share your opinion, educate the public about animal issues, applaud someone for doing the right thing, or criticize inhumane policies. A well written, well timed letter to the editor can shift public opinion and being influence policy. Tips from the public Relations staff at The hsus: Editors prefer to publish timely, concise letters that respond to an article, editorial, or other letter that appeared in the newspaper. They also prefer to run letters about issues of local importance and interest. Before writing your letter, review the newspaper's policy on letters to the editor. It is frequently available on the newspaper's web site under the Opinion section. Write and submit your letter as quickly as possible, preferably the same day that the article runs. Submit letters by email whenever possible. (look for the email address on the newspaper's Web site). Your letter must stand on its own—not all readers will have seen the original story.
The lie behind the lie detector and distribute it gratis via this website to contribute to that end. One way that polygraph victims can help debunk the polygraph charade without incurring retaliation is to anonymously post and discuss their experiences here on the AntiPolygraph. The Internet has become a productive research tool, and any journalist, lawyer, legislator, or government employee researching polygraphy is likely to find this website. Those who face polygraph "testing" will increasingly be finding this website, too. The day is coming when so many of those subject to polygraph "testing" will understand "the summary lie behind the lie detector" that the charade can no longer continue. Everyone can help hasten that day by telling friends, relatives, acquaintances, or colleagues about this site. Last modification: george maschke - 01/16/01 at 07:08:33.
At page 278. A tremor in the paper Blood: Uses and Abuses of the lie detector he writes:":.it seems apparent that the truth technology. E., lie detector "testing" lined must be regarded as a growing menace in American life, a trend to be resisted and, it may be hoped, beaten by measures more dependable and lasting than secreting a tack in one's sock. The 1988 Employee polygraph Protection Act was an important step in the right direction. Extending that act to cover federal, state, and local government employees should be the next step. I believe, however, that the only safe solution, the only way to truly beat the lie detector, is to demythologize. If lawyers, employers, judges, legislators, and government bureaucrats knew what you know now about the lie test, then the menace would be manageable. The first purpose of this book is to contribute to that end. Scalabrini and i also wrote.
And I think those fears are not entirely unjustified. But I doubt that members of Congress and senior government officials will be prompted to take action based on anonymous letters received. If at all possible, it would be better to write to them with one's real name and address and to follow up with a phone call. If you write a letter to the editor of a newspaper, you can ask that your name be withheld if your letter is published. The technique twoBlock mentioned (using an assumed name and a trusted friend's address) would at least allow you to receive a response, but if you were to send letters in that way, the recipient might be skeptical. In your earlier message, you wrote:": I believe one of the ways to debunk this charade is to attack the polygraph industry not only through official means but also where the polygraph industries strength the arena of American popular culture. I agree with you. So does david. Lykken, America's most prominent polygraph critic.
Find your Legislator - pa general Assembly
Keep letters brief- no more than one page. If you're writing about a bill, mention the bill's name and number and whether you support or oppose it in the first paragraph. Include reasons and supporting data in the next paragraph. Conclude by asking for a response. Focus on a very specific topic. As few as 10 letters on any topic can sway a legislator's vote. An hour of letter writing every month may favourite make a big impact.
Harlot wrote:": I dont know what the ramifications would be (actions taken against me) if my position on polygraphs were disclosed by any letters I might happen to write. I believe there are lots of individuals out there traped in the same situation. I also believe this desk is a big reason why there are not more people coming forward with testimonials and not sending letters. Can I send out a letter and still protect my anonymity? I suspect that many employees and applicants for jobs with federal agencies who are wrongly accused of deception in polygraph screening "tests" fear retaliation if they publicly oppose polygraph policy.
better: " Maxxam, the houston corporation, cuts down 2,000-year-old trees to make 2x4s. Ancient forests are a national treasure, and are more important than paper products." "Legislators estimate that 10 letters from constituents represent the concerns of 10,000 citizens. Anybody who will take the time to write is voicing the fears and desires of thousands more." -former, congressperson Billy evan Some people refuse to write letters to legislators because they feel it is a waste of time, or because they do not support the. Government, or any government. This is a complicated issue. However, if you don't know if the letter you write will have any impact, why not choose to err on the safe side?
Writing a letter doesn't mean you are selling out, or that you support a fraudulent government. The slf is composed of mainly anarchists, but we recognize that our movements need every tactic we have to bring about total liberation. Find out your state and federal legislators. State: m Federal: http congress. Org/ Or you can call and tell the operator your zip code. Identify yourself as a concerned citizen, not a member of an organization. Politicians will think you are pushing a group's agenda, rather than being a good ol' neighbor.
Writing, your, elected Officials
Find out what this is, and don't send more than the limit. Avoid self-righteous language and exaggeration. Readers will dismiss your arguments. For example: "Only a heartless sadist could continue to eat meat and dairy when any fool for knows their lives are snuffed out in screaming agony for the satisfaction of people who can't be bothered to take a moral stand.". Better: "Most compassionate people would stop eating animal products if they saw how horribly the animals are raised and slaughtered.". Don't assume your audience knows the issue. For example: "Boycott Maxxam.
Send it the day of, plan if possible. Your chances of getting published increase if you can tie it into a news event or anniversary. Editors like pieces with a "news peg.". Try to tell readers something they aren't likely to know. Whenever possible, tell something that readers can. Keep personal attacks out of letters. Most papers won't accept letters on behalf of a group. Have an individual sign it (group affiliation is ok, though). Most newspapers have a limit on how often a person can write.
get reader's attention. Use the writing style of journalists: avoid flowery language, write in clear and concise fashion, and keep paragraphs to no more than two or three sentences. Stick to one issue. Most people can't address the downfall of modern civilization in 250 words. The letter should be timely.
For every letter you have published in the paper, you keep your issue at the front of people's minds. It makes people realize your group is out there fighting. Also, every publication is kind of a small victory, and it keeps momentum going in the group. The bottom line is that if you are willing to organize a protest, or get arrested, or fight the cops, you can write a stinkin' letter once in a while. Here are some tips for writing letters to the editor: be brief! Sometimes one short paragraph is enough. Firing Lines for the. Daily texan have to be under 250 words, but try to make it even shorter: there's a better chance it will get in, and better chance people will get a clear message from.general
Immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych: Unvaccinated
Make it a point to read the. Daily texan, austin, american-Statesman and other media. Keep plan on top of what's in the paper, and use it as an excuse to make your voice heard. For example, anytime an animal-related issue is in the paper, Students Against Cruelty to Animals floods the paper with letters to the editor. Often, they have three or four printed in a single issue. Some people dismiss letter writing as a waste of time. The mentality is that it is not "revolutionary" or "radical" enough. Letter writing should be looked at as a campaign tactic. A revolution may not come through writing letters alone, but it won't come through direct action alone, either.