My arguments will be open to all, and may be judged of by all. They shall at least be offered in a spirit which will not disgrace the cause of truth. I propose, in a series of papers, to discuss the following interesting particulars: the utility of the union to your political prosperity. The insufficiency of the present confederation to preserve that union the necessity oovernment at least equally energetic with the one proposed, to the attainment of this object the conformity of the proposed constitution to the true principles of republican government its analogy to your own. In the progress of this discussion I shall endeavor to give a satisfactory answer to all the objections which shall have made their appearance, that may seem to have any claim to your attention. It may perhaps be thought superfluous to offer arguments to prove the utility of the union, a point, no doubt, deeply engraved on the hearts of the great body of the people in every State, and one, which it may be imagined, has no adversaries. But the fact is, that we already hear it whispered in the private circles of those who oppose the new Constitution, that the thirteen States are of too great extent for any general system, and that we must of necessity resort to separate confederacies.
The federalist Papers - wikipedia
History will teach us that the former has been found a person much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying. In the course of the preceding observations, i have had an eye, my fellow-citizens, to putting you upon your guard against all attempts, from whatever quarter, to influence your decision in a matter of the utmost moment to your welfare, by any impressions other than. You will, no doubt, at the same time, have collected from the general scope of them, that they proceed from a source not unfriendly to the new Constitution. Yes, my countrymen, i own to you that, after having given it an attentive consideration, i am clearly of opinion it is your interest to adopt. I am convinced that this is the safest course for your liberty, your dignity, and your happiness. I affect not reserves which I do not feel. I will not amuse you with an appearance of deliberation when I have decided. I frankly acknowledge to you my convictions, and I will freely lay before game you the reasons on which they are founded. The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity. I shall not, however, multiply professions on this head. My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast.
And yet, however just these sentiments will be allowed to be, we have already sufficient indications that it will happen in this as in all former cases of paper great national discussion. A torrent of angry and malignant passions will be let loose. To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness. An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty. An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good. It will be forgotten, on the one hand, that jealousy is the usual concomitant of love, and that the noble enthusiasm of liberty is apt to be infected with a spirit of narrow and illiberal distrust. On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgment, their interest can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks.
Candor will oblige us to admit that guaranteed even such men london may be actuated by upright intentions; and it cannot be doubted that much of the opposition which has made its appearance, or may hereafter make its appearance, will spring from sources, blameless at least,. So numerous indeed and so powerful are the causes which serve to give a false bias to the judgment, that we, upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong as well as on the right side of questions of the first magnitude. This circumstance, if duly attended to, would furnish a lesson of moderation to those who are ever so much persuaded of their being in the right in any controversy. And a further reason for caution, in this respect, might be drawn from the reflection that we are not always sure that those who advocate the truth are influenced by purer principles than their antagonists. Ambition, avarice, personal animosity, party opposition, and many other motives not more laudable than these, are apt to operate as well upon those who support as those who oppose the right side of a question. Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties. For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution.
It has been frequently remarked that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice. If there be any truth in the remark, the crisis at which we are arrived may with propriety be regarded as the era in which that decision is to be made; and a wrong election of the part we shall act may, in this view. This idea will add the inducements of philanthropy to those of patriotism, to heighten the solicitude which all considerate and good men must feel for the event. Happy will it be if our choice should be directed by a judicious estimate of our true interests, unperplexed and unbiased by considerations not connected with the public good. But this is a thing more ardently to be wished than seriously to be expected. The plan offered to our deliberations affects too many particular interests, innovates upon too many local institutions, not to involve in its discussion a variety of objects foreign to its merits, and of views, passions and prejudices little favorable to the discovery of truth. Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and. It is not, however, my design to dwell upon observations of this nature. I am well aware that it would be disingenuous to resolve indiscriminately the opposition of any set of men (merely because their situations might subject them to suspicion) into interested or ambitious views.
The federalist - contents - constitution Society
I stuck with that for a couple years then discovered long boarding. After I discovered long boarding, i dropped skate boarding and to this day, i still long board, and i also bmx along with long distance biking. Throughout my whole life my grandparents have a huge part. They support me in everything that i do and have always been there for. And since i never really had a father figure in my life my grandpa helped make me who i am today. Which essay i like to think is a hard working respectful young man. But there is still a person who i have yet to talk about and that is my uncle, he is my biggest role model and inspiration.
He is 43 years old and is running marathons, a top competitor in triathlons and is a 20 year veteran of the navy. He is my biggest inspiration because i can only hope to be able to compete in a triathlon when i am 40 years old. 1, general Introduction, for the Independent journal. To the people of the State of New York: after an unequivocal experience of the inefficiency of the subsisting federal government, you are called upon to deliberate on a new Constitution for the United resume States of America. The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the union, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the fate of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world.
My life has been one big adventure so far, full of excitement and different experiences. I was a very active child and very outgoing. Throughout grade school, i played baseball, soccer, basketball, and football. Out of all of those, i was the best at soccer. In addition to all of those sports I was in the process of learning how to skateboard. However, out of everything my favorite thing during my childhood was my bike.
I learned how to ride a bike without training wheels when I was about 3 years old. Ever since then I have loved to ride bikes and has lead me now to be doing long distance bike riding and long distance trail/off road bike riding. So, up until middle school I was big into sports. I quit all of my sport playing and became more involved in being a boy scout in route to become an eagle scout. However, i did not stay in long enough to receive my eagle Scout rank; I learned valuable lessons and skills that may come in good use for the feature. So towards the end of my scouting career I started to pick up skateboarding again.
The federalist Papers Essay 78 Summary and Analysis
Having and knowing our own personal rights greatly benefits the people, and probably helps make governing the nation easier. Even though a bill of Rights was not included in the constitution, i still would have voted to ratify. The constitution of the United States, an amazingly historic document, was incredibly hard to create because of the opposing views of the federalists and the Anti-federalists. In the end, the federalists would be considered the victors, because most presentation of the things they wanted to be part of the constitution were included. The Anti-federalists were extremely unhappy with the constitution because most of their ideas were rejected. Today, most of these Anti-federalist views are gone. The vast majority of the population sees the constitution as an ingenious document that is the foundation of the greatest nation in the world. My name is Mark eveland. I am 16 years old about to be 17 on June.
S wireless individual rights were not covered well enough in the document, and a bill of Rights declaring these needed to be included. The last main thing the Anti-federalists weren? T pleased about was? If think that if I had lived during this time period, i would have been very happy with almost all of the constitution. I feel that having representatives in one of the houses of Congress is truly in the people? S best interests, even though the smaller states end up with less representation. I also think that having one higher governing body over the other states makes the. Without this central government, the states might have ended up forming separate nations, nowhere near as strong as our nation is today. The only thing I would have changed about the constitution would have been a bill of Rights.
as Anti-federalists. There were many reasons as to why the Anti-federalists were not happy, some more important than others. One of their biggest complaints was that every state was different, therefore they all needed to have their own separate governments. They felt it would be impossible to have a central ruling body, because the states all had their own identities. A lot of the states were similar in some ways, but no two were exactly alike. Another problem they had with the constitution was that there was no bill of Rights. The Anti-federalists thought the people?
The constitution took so long to be created because of the opposite views of the federalists and Anti-federalists. The federalists were extremely pleased with the ratification of the constitution. Almost everything they wanted to be a part of the document was included. They felt that in order for the states to feel equal, presentation they would all need to be part of a stronger, higher government, and the constitution provided this. Each state would be governed by most of the same laws, and the people would all be equally represented in congress, therefore there was no reason for the people to feel that they weren? T equal to other states. The federalists obviously wanted the government to represent the people, that is why they based the state? S representatives in congress on population.
Federalist Papers Summary
Anit-Federalism Essay, research Paper, perhaps the paper greatest document of all time, the constitution of the United States of America was not easily created. Fifty-five great men were needed to hammer out all the details of the constitution in a long grueling process. As James Madison, architect of the constitution said? The writing of the constitution formed a task more difficult than can be well conceived by those who were not concerned in the execution. Adding to the difficulty the natural diversity of human opinions on all new and complicated subjects, it is impossible to consider the degree of concord which ultimately prevailed as less than a miracle? Natural diversity of human opinions? Which Madison spoke of can be split into two basic groups, federalists, and Anti-federalists.