Word count: up to 1,000 words not including abstract, tables, figures or references Abstract: up to 250 words Illustrations and tables: up to 3 References: up to 10 What this paper adds Box Please produce a box offering a thumbnail sketch of what your article adds. Section 2: What this study adds In one or two single sentence bullet points give a simple answer to the question What do we now know as a result of this study that we did not know before? Review we welcome submissions of both Practical reviews (e.g. Treatment of the patient with asthma) and systematic reviews which focus on a specific question. For systematic reviews, prisma guidelines should be followed and a checklist submitted. In both cases, the methods section should include a description of the process of literature retrieval. Practical reviews should be submitted under the heading of review while systematic reviews should be submitted as Original Articles. Additional information may be placed on the website as a data supplement.
Secrets of the Old One: Einstein, 1905
Be clear and specific, not vague. For example you might say: Numerous observational studies have suggested that tea drinking may be effective in treating depression, but until now evidence from randomised controlled trials has been lacking/the only randomised controlled trial to date was underpowered/was carried out in an unusual population/did not. Or: evidence from trials of tea therapy in depression have given conflicting results. Although Sjogren and Smith conducted a systematic review in 1995, a further 15 trials have been carried out since then Section 2: What this study adds In one or two language single sentence bullet points give a simple answer to the question What do we now. Be brief, succinct, specific, and accurate. For example: Our study suggests that tea drinking has no overall benefit in depression. You might use the last sentence to summarise any implications for practice, research, policy, or public health. For example, your study might have: asked and answered a new question (one whose relevance has only recently become clear) contradicted a belief, dogma, or previous evidence provided a new perspective on something that is already known in general provided evidence of higher methodological quality. Short report Short reports of experimental work, new methods, or a preliminary report can be accepted as two page papers; maximum length 1,000 words not including need abstract, tables, and legends. The methodology section should include a statement about ethics approval. Additional information may be placed on the web site as a data supplement.
Results : Please follow the standardized guidelines (as in Methods) for reporting of results. For statistics, confidence intervals are preferred to p values. Discussion : The discussion should begin with a brief summary of the findings (no more than one paragraph) followed by the following (in whatever order works best in the flow of the article how this thesis study is similar or different from prior studies with regards. If you wish to offer a conclusion, this should be done in the last paragraph of the discussion rather than as a separate subsection. Tables should be placed in the main text where they are first cited while figures should be provided as supplementary files. What this paper adds Box Please produce a box offering a thumbnail sketch of what your article adds to the literature, for readers who would like an overview without reading the whole article It should be divided into two short sections, each with 1-3 short. Section 1: What is already known on this subject In two or three single sentence bullet points please summarise the state of scientific knowledge on this subject before you did your study and why this study needed to be done.
Please see goodacre, march 2015 Uncontrolled before-after studies: discouraged by cochrane and the emj. Recommended sections: Introduction : The article should include a brief introduction explaining why you chose to do the study this would include a description of the importance of the topic, a summary of what is presentation already known and why the study was needed, and the. Three to four paragraphs should be sufficient. Methods : guidelines exist for the reporting of methodology and results for randomized trials, observational studies and retrospective chart review. Please see above or refer to the equator website for guidelines according to the specific type of study. The methodology section must include a statement about ethics approval before it can be reviewed. Clinical trials must be previously registered and the registration number given.
Original articles, full length articles reporting research. Authors of original articles and systematic reviews are required to comply with one of the appropriate reporting guidelines endorsed by the. A completed guideline checklist must be included with the submission. All clinical trials require prospective registration. Abstract: 300 words Word count: up to 3000 words Illustrations and tables: up to 6 References: 25 Additional information (such as data collection tools, surveys, etc) may be placed on the web site as a data supplement. In some cases, we may ask to publish the abstract in print and the full-length article on the website only. You also have the option to publish the abstract of your paper in your local language. If you wish to do this, please upload a word copy of your abstract to your manuscript on Scholar One and save it as supplementary material. We have specific requirements for before and after (pre-post) studies.
Short, paper - vtsts
Required for all observational studies, required for all meta-analyses of observational studies. Guidance and forms are available here./ Article publishing charges, during resume submission, authors can choose to have their article published open access for 1,950 gbp (exclusive of vat for uk and eu authors). . Authors can also choose to publish their article in colour for the print edition instead of the default option of black and white for 250 gbp. There are no submission, page or online-only colour figure charges. For more information on open access, funder compliance and institutional programmes please refer to the.
Bmj author Hub open access page. Submission guidelines, please review the below article type specifications including the required article lengths, illustrations, table limits and reference counts. The word count excludes the title page, abstract, years tables, acknowledgements, contributions and references. Manuscripts should be as succinct as possible. For further support when making your submission please refer to the resources available on the. Here you can also find general formatting guidelines across bmj and a formatting checklist.
Read these instructions here. Watch the videos : our Editor Ellen Weber explains how to get your paper published. Editorial policy, emergency medicine journal adheres to the highest standards concerning its editorial policies on publication ethics, scientific misconduct, consent and peer review criteria. To view all bmj journal policies please refer to the. Bmj author Hub policies page.
Articles are published under an exclusive licence (or non-exclusive licence for uk crown and us federal government employees) and authors retain copyright. Articles can also be published under a creative commons licence to facilitate reuse of the content; please refer to the. Emergency medicine journal, copyright Author Licence Statement. Reporting guidelines, bMJ requires compliance with the following reporting guidelines; please upload your completed checklist with your submission and label it Research Checklist. Below is a list of the most commonly used research checklists which should be selected based on the type of study you are reporting. If your studys methodology does not have a suitable research checklist you may submit the paper, but must state in the cover letter why no checklist is attached. Required for all randomised controlled trials. Required for all systematic reviews, required for all economic evaluations, required for all diagnostic research papers.
editors Update - your network
Provide context for the reader on the contribution of the research we publish to our overall knowledge base. Provide educational material on practice and teaching that is evidence-based. Provide innovative methods of delivering information including both print, web-based and mobile technology. Provide a forum for discussion and controversy. Ensure that a fair, independent and respectful peer review system is in place. Adhere to the highest ethical standards of research conduct. We receive far more papers than we can publish; thus all papers are reviewed by the Editor in Chief on submission but only some will be write sent on for external peer review. Our goal is to give you a decision within one week for submissions we are not sending on for further review. The editors have provided some guidance on how to create a paper with the best chance of being accepted.
After its assigned to an issue, your final paper is made available. Read more about Proofing and licensing. Now that your article is published, you can promote it to make a bigger impact with your research. Sharing research, accomplishments and ambitions with a wider audience makes you more visible in argumentative your field. This helps you get cited more, enabling you to cultivate a stronger reputation, promote your research and move forward in your career. Emergency medicine journal is committed to the publication of high quality research, educational material, and perspective that will be of interest to a broad audience of emergency practitioners, including physicians, nurses and paramedics, within different settings and in different countries. Our scope includes emergency department care, urgent care, pre-hospital care and the interface of emergency medicine with colleagues in other specialties and public policy. Our priorities are to: Publish high quality and cutting edge research in clinical care, education, and health services deliver.
evise. Track your accepted article, once your paper is accepted for publication, you will receive a reference number and a direct link that lets you follow its publication status via elseviers Track your Accepted Article service. However, even without a notification you can track the status of your article by entering your article reference number and corresponding author surname. Track your Accepted Article. Read more about Track your Accepted Article. Make sure you complete the copyright form and select a license if you have chosen to publish open access. A proof of your paper will be sent to you for checking and marking corrections. .
With more than 3 million users, mendeley makes your life easier by helping you literature organize your papers, citations and references, accessing them in the cloud on any device, wherever you are. Submit and revise, you can submit to most Elsevier journals using our online systems; the system you use will depend on the journal to which you submit. You can access the relevant submission system via the 'submit your Paper' link on the m journal homepage of your chosen journal. Alternatively, if you have been invited to submit to a journal, follow the instructions provided to you. Once submitted, your paper will be considered by the editor and if it passes initial screening, it will be sent for peer review by experts in your field. If deemed unsuitable for publication in your chosen journal, the editor may suggest you transfer your submission to a more suitable journal, via. Track your submission, you can track the status of your submitted paper online in either the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) or Elseviers new system, evise.
Journal of Electrical Systems (issn: )
Prepare your paper for submission. Download our 'get Published' quick guide', which outlines the presentation essential steps in preparing a paper. (This is also available. It is very important that you stick to the specific guide for Authors of the journal you are submitting. This is found on the journal Home page. You can find information about the publishing process in the 'understanding the publishing process' guide. It covers topics such as Authors' rights, Ethics and Plagiarism, and journal and article metrics. . If you have research data to share, make sure you read the guide for authors to find out which options the journal offers to share research data with your article. Free e-learning modules on preparing your manuscript can be found.