Theory vs Case Studies Ratio in GS4-2017 year Theory case-Study total After two years (15 and 16 again theory portion gains slightly more prominence against case studies. Perhaps its simple arithmetic without any deep reflections or perhaps examiner realized that the case studies in upsc databank are not grey, deep and subtle enough to analyse a candidates character so better just ask direct theory. Length of the gs4 Paper in : gsm1 to 3 gsm marks question 150 words Same 15 marks question 250 words 20 marks question 250 words Total length 4000 words for 250 marks. Total length: 13Q in theory x (150 words) 6 case studies (250 words) 3450 words for 250 marks. Thus, gs4-2017 is slightly shorter paper than first three gs paper of 2017. However, in actual exam hall, doesnt mean a short paper because Essay paper 2400 words. Ethics paper is also full of essayish questions, and yet 1050 words longer. 2016s gsm4 paper (12Q x 150 words) (4Q x 250 words) (2Q x 300 words) Total length: 3400 words 50 words longer paper.
2 nd, year, english, essay
Answer is verbatim available in chapter 6 page 47 of 2nd arc report.1. Ethical issues in international relation is such vague topic, theyre only asking essayish question first in 2015, and now again in 2017. Nothing directly from citizen charter yet- since 2013. Atleast nothing atarangi (Crazy) asked upsc had habit of placing 2-3 (Crazy) questions each years in gsm2 and gsm4. In 2017, thankfully, both papers were saved. Gsm2 ive already analysed (link) gsm4-2017: no crazy questions like environmental ethics, max webers bureaucratic morality, or John Rawls Social justice in Indian context. This time, they gave a"tion of Napoleon but straightforward asked who harmed society and who helped. Overall, most of the questions and case studies can be solved from the routine books on Ethics, write Integrity and Aptitude by roychaudhari subbarao or Moral Lexicon by Chronicle. Karthikeyans book or Arihant Publications book. Along with 2nd arc report.
2015: asked about inclusive growth. 2017- again asked small minority having all wealth at the cost of majority population. 2015: asked about how to resolve conflict of interest? 2017: again asked same thing. Examiner lists 3-5 qualities of a good civil servant business and ask you to elaborate. Happened in 2013, repeated in 2017 again. 2015- officers afraid to take initiative due to rti and media scrutiny. Same theory question now asked as a case study in 2017: As pio how will you thwart attempts of rti activists extorting money from Decision makers and help genuine rti applicants at the same time?
Sometimes you get gsm1, gsm2 or gsm3 related case studies on urban development, disaster management, role of civil services and pressure groups. In past they asked about presentation environmental pollution (GSM3 issues related to women (GSM1). 2017- asked about illegal buildings in cities- its associated with gsm1 topic urbanization problem remedies or even gsm2- government policies related to individual sector. Usually one case study pertains to woman related issues. But nothing in 2017, despite 24/7 News-media coverage on Kangna ranaut and Hrithik roshan, honeypreet and Ramrahim. May be too hot current topic to be asked for present year, theyll ask next year, as they have been doing in gsm3. Theory: Pingpong repetition continues from past 2013: asked politics and ethics can be together. 2017- asked why ethical young people are not joining active politics.
Road Accident) and asking you to hide. Your company is indulged in rackless profiteering by 1) doing river pollution 2) shifting factory to residential area and disturbing inhabitants or 3) not doing drug research for tribal population because customers wont be able to afford. Displacement seems to be recurring dilemma faced by public and private organizations each year. Sometimes examiner worried that landless poor have to migrate to urban areas. 2017: illegal construction and workers died. Sometimes he wants rural youth to stay within backward rural areas. Sometimes hes worried about influx of migrants coming to backward area due to new company!
Essay on, patriotism for Children and Students
So, case studies lack depth or sufficient grey areas. Same clichéd things repeatedly asked, whether its easy to identify good vs bad, and then every aspirant goes crazy data on portraying himself as a boy scout. Here are the common and recurring themes / plots in the case studies of Ethics paper: There is a helpless weaker section (children, girl students, woman with no document, dalit cook) and youve to intervene. Until now, these case studies asked you to help them as an officer (i.e. After selection in government service but 2017 they asked you to help an accident victim on your way to government job green interview (i.e. In work culture at office : sexual harassment, work deadline, chalta hai mindset, hush-hush to windup a file/tender/acquisition, pressure from above to reveal information, help a relative etc. They list the problems faced by impractical honest upright officer, then ask your opinion as a friend of the said officer- should he leave, resign, whistlblow?
2014- two such questions. 2017- examiner made you the honest officer and asked you directly betaa what do you think of this? If youre working in private organization: there are only four issues: your boss / collegue is a sex maniac or a wife beater. Should you expose or keep mum? Trade union walla are creating trouble by 1) asking for jobs for their political party workers or 2) one of drunkard has died, they want compensation. Youve to get an important contract or tender but the other party is asking bribe or doing something wrong (e.g.
Length of the gs4 Paper in 2017. Topicwise Ethics Papers since syllabus Change (2013-17). Block1 Basic, Thinkers, eq, ethics- basic Theory, emotional intelligence allied Topics. Thinkers and Reformers, block2 Surroundings, attitude, family, society. Social influence, block3 Job, sarkaari job Values, work culture @Office. Compassion for others while on job.
Block4 Public organizations, public Org- Theory, public Org- dilemma. Public org- code of conduct / ethics. Public Org-Charter, public Org-Corruption, public Org-rti, ir and Funding. Block5 Private organizations, upsc mains-2017: question Paper GS4 (Linear Format). To see the question paper in linear format. Question 1 to 14: Click me to download pdf. Here goes the analysis: Recurring themes in case studies, nothing new under the sun. How helpful are gsm4 case studies in judging real character of a candidate, will be an interesting case study in itself when ips safeer Karim reappears, with a bluetooth device to cheat in the mains-2017 exam. Anyways, gsm4 has ill-planned syllabus made up in haste.
Essay, in, english, for 2, nd, year — 625751 forum
Sourcing From the Enterprise perspective, 2:30. Christopher Bedell, The listing david. Walter Spiegel, Standard Textile. Martha cutright Sarra, the Kroger. Upsc mains-2017: question Paper GS4 (Linear Format). Recurring themes in case studies, theory: Pingpong repetition continues, atleast summary Nothing crazy asked. Theory vs Case Studies Ratio in GS4-2017.
Csr and the Closely held Company, 1:15. Eric Chaffee, the University of Toledo college of Law. Michael Petrucci, firstGroup America, inc. Lisa wintersheimer Michel, keating muething klekamp pll.
Symposium materials will be available on March 14 at: Please register by contacting Lori Strait: email email protected ; resumes fax ; or phone. Clare iery, the Procter gamble company. Social Enterprises and Changing Legal Forms, 9:30. Mark loewenstein, University of Colorado law School. Clark,., Drinker Biddle reath llp. Haskell Murray, belmont University college of Business. Russell Menyhart, taft Stettinius hollister llp.
459 Words, essay on, patriotism, for Class
I am looking forward to presenting at this conference next month. Looks like a great group of academics and paper practitioners. Cross-posted at, business Law Prof Blog. —, university of Cincinnati college of Law. The 29th Annual Corporate law Center Symposium corporate social Responsibility and the modern Enterprise. March 18, 2016 8:45. Hilton Netherland Plaza, pavilion Ballroom, this event is free. Cle:.0 hours, pending approval. Presented by the University of Cincinnati college of Laws Corporate law Center and Law review.