Anything you do not give freely and abundantly becomes lost to you. You open your safe and find ashes. The Writing Life is absolutely indispensable in its entirety. Pair it with these 10 essential books on writing and literary icons collected advice. September 17, 1989 'Spend It All, Shoot It, Play it, lose It'. By sara maitland, the writing life, by Annie dillard.
Pilgrim at Tinker Creek - wikipedia
We still and always want waking. Dillard adds to other literary icons reflections on why writers write, including george Orwell, joan Didion, david Foster Wallace, mary karr, joy williams, isabel Allende, charles bukowski, and Susan Orlean : The sensation of writing a book is the sensation of spinning, blinded by love. At its best, the sensation of writing is that of any unmerited grace. It is handed to you, but only if you look for. You search, you break your heart, your back, your brain, and then — and only then — it is handed to you. But Dillards most poignant and timeless insight is the reminder that this gift is one to share, not to keep: One of the few things dreams i know about writing is this: spend it all, shoot it, play it, lose it, all, right away, every time. Do not hoard what seems good for a later place in the book, or for another book; give it, give it all, give it now. The impulse to save something good for a better place later is the signal to spend it now. Something more will arise for later, something better. These things fill from behind, from beneath, like well water. Similarly, the impulse to keep to yourself what you have learned is not only shameful, it is destructive.
At the same time, assume you write for an audience consisting solely of terminal patients. That is, after all, the case. What would you begin writing if you knew you would die soon? What could you say to a dying person that would not enrage by its triviality? Why remote are we reading if not in hope that the writer will magnify and dramatize our days, will illuminate and inspire us with wisdom, courage, and the possibility of meaningfulness, and will press upon our minds the deepest mysteries, so we may feel again their. What do we ever know that is higher than that power which, from time to time, seizes our lives, and reveals us startlingly to ourselves as creatures set down here bewildered? Why does death so catch us by surprise, and why love?
How fondly i recall thinking, in the old days, that to write biography you needed paper, pen, and a lap. How appalled I was to discover that, in order to write so much as a sonnet, you need a warehouse. You can easily get so confused writing a thirty-page chapter that in order to make an outline for the second draft, you have to rent a hall. I have often written with the mechanical aid of a twenty-foot conference table. You lay your pages along the tables edge and pace out the work. You walk along the rows; you weed bits, move bits, and dig out bits, bent over the rows with full hands like a gardener. After a couple of hours, you have taken an exceedingly dull nine-mile hike. You go home and soak your feet. And yet writing necessitates a certain higher-level awareness of life and its opposite, something Christopher Hitchens would come to echo in asserting that one should write as if posthumously : Write as if you were dying.
The obverse of this freedom, of course, is that your work is so meaningless, so fully for yourself alone, and so worthless to the world, that no one except you cares whether you do it well, or ever. You are free to make several thousand close judgment calls a day. Your freedom is a by-product of your days triviality. In fact, echoing, tchaikovskys wisdom on work ethic, dillard admonishes against this precious solipsism of the writers world: The notion that one can write better during one season of the year than another Samuel Johnson labeled, Imagination operating upon luxury. Another luxury for an idle imagination is the writers own feeling about the work. There is neither a proportional relationship, nor an inverse one, between a writers estimation of a work in progress and its actual quality. The feeling that the work is magnificent, and the feeling that it is abominable, are both mosquitoes to be repelled, ignored, or killed, but not indulged. Dillard offers another necessary antidote to the preciousness of the writing process by reminding us of the demandingly physical world it inhabits: The materiality of the writers life cannot be exaggerated. If you like metaphysics, throw pots.
Annie, dillard - official Site
The desk and chair float thirty feet from the ground, between the crowns of maple trees. The furniture is in place; you go back for your thermos of coffee. Then, wincing, you step out again through the French doors and sit down on the chair and look over the desktop. You can see clear to the river from here in winter. You pour yourself a cup of coffee. Birds fly under your chair. In spring, when the leaves open in the maples crowns, your view stops in the treetops just beyond the desk; yellow warblers hiss and whisper on the high twigs, and catch flies.
Your work is to keep cranking the flywheel that turns the gears that spin the belt in the engine of belief that keeps you and your desk in midair. But beneath this magic lies a subtle recognition of its necessary dark side: Putting a book together is interesting and exhilarating. It is sufficiently difficult and complex that it engages all your intelligence. It is life designer at its most free. Your freedom as a writer is not freedom of expression in the sense of wild blurting; you may not let rip. It is life at its most free, if you are fortunate enough to be able to try it, because enjoyed you select your materials, invent your task, and pace yourself.
What you had planned will not. If you pursue your present course, the book will explode or collapse, and you do not know about it yet, quite. What do you do? Acknowledge, first, that you cannot do nothing. Lay out the structure you already have, x-ray it for a hairline fracture, find it, and think about it for a week or a year; solve the insoluble problem.
Or subject the next part, the part at which the worker balks, to harsh tests. It harbors an unexamined and wrong premise. Something completely necessary is false or fatal. Once you find it, and if you can accept the finding, of course it will mean starting again. This is why many experienced writers urge young men and women to learn a useful trade. Like many celebrated writers, dillard recognizes how vital a daily routine or daily ritual is in lubricating the machinery of this painstaking process: every morning you climb several flights of stairs, enter your study, open the French doors, and slide your desk and chair out.
Annie, dillard, the, full, wiki
If a sentence does not illuminate your subject in some new and useful way, kurt Vonnegut admonished in his eight keys to the power of the written word, scratch it out. Dillard puts it even more beautifully: In a testament to the notion that creativity is subtraction, she considers the enormous act of courage that self-editing requires: How many books do we read from which the writer lacked courage to tie off the umbilical cord? How many gifts do we open from which the writer neglected to remove the price tag? Is it pertinent, is it courteous, for us to learn friend what it cost the writer personally? At the same time, writing a book requires enormous structural craftsmanship and logical stamina, a failure of either of which could produce what we often call creative block. But Dillard proposes a strategy for diverting disaster: When you are stuck in a book; when you are well into writing it, and know what comes next, and yet cannot go on; when every morning for a week or a month you enter its room. Either the structure has forked, so the narrative, or the logic, has developed a hairline fracture that will shortly split it up the middle — or you are approaching a fatal mistake.
In those early pages and chapters anyone may find bold leaps to nowhere, read the brave beginnings of dropped themes, hear a tone since abandoned, discover blind alleys, track red herrings, and laboriously learn a setting now false. She later considers both sides of whether or not to edit in stride: The reason to perfect a piece of prose as it murree progresses — to secure each sentence before building on it — is that original writing fashions a form. It unrolls out into nothingness. It grows cell to cell, bole to bough to twig to leaf; any careful word may suggest a route, may begin a strand of metaphor or event out of which much, or all, will develop. Perfecting the work inch by inch, writing from the first word toward the last, displays the courage and fear this method induces. The reason not to perfect a work as it progresses is that, concomitantly, original work fashions a form the true shape of which it discovers only as it proceeds, so the early strokes are useless, however fine their sheen. Only when a paragraphs role in the context of the whole work is clear can the envisioning writer direct its complexity of detail to strengthen the works ends. Be merciless on yourself.
how it differs from other art: It is the beginning of a work that the writer throws away. A painting covers its tracks. Painters work from the ground. The latest version of a painting overlays earlier versions, and obliterates them. Writers, on the other hand, work from left to right. The discardable chapters are on the left. The latest version of a literary work begins somewhere in the works middle, and hardens toward the end. The earlier version remains lumpishly on the left; the works beginning greets the reader with the wrong hand.
You make the path boldly and follow it fearfully. You go where the path leads. At the end of the path, you find a box canyon. You hammer out reports, dispatch bulletins. The list writing has changed, in your hands, and in a twinkling, from an expression of your notions to an epistemological tool. The new place interests you because it is not clear. In your humility, you lay down the words carefully, watching all the angles. Now the earlier writing looks soft and careless. Process is nothing; erase your tracks.
Writing, fiction: a guide to narrative craft by janet
What does it really mean to write? Why do writers labor at it, and why are readers so mesmerized by it? From, annie dillard s timelessly wonderful, the Writing Life ( public library ) — which also gave us her vital reminder that presence rather than productivity is the key to living richly and her meditation on what a stunt pilot teaches us about creativity and. Dillard begins: When you write, you lay out a line of words. The line of words is a miners pick, a woodcarvers gouge, a surgeons probe. You wield it, and it digs a path you follow. Soon you find yourself deep in new territory. Is it a dead end, or have you located the real subject? You will know tomorrow, or this time next year.